Readers' Advisory Secret Shopper Assignment
Readers’ advisory [RA] is
a service that all librarians should be able to offer their patrons, and it
goes beyond simply recommending titles or pointing patrons in the right
direction so that they can find titles on their own. For my secret shopper
assignment, I chose to reach out to large public library which offers virtual
reference services. I said, “I want to find novels that take place in suburban
America during the 20th or 21st century. The state doesn’t matter. They just
need to be set in the suburbs. Can you suggest any books?” The librarian, Christina,
suggested that I use the library’s catalog and NoveList to search for titles. She
offered to walk me through how to use both if I was unfamiliar with them. She
did not ask me if I had read any novels set in the suburbs before nor did she
ask if I knew of any—two ways she could have easily found read-alikes on
NoveList. She also suggested that I use the library’s personalized book
selection service which is a form that patrons can fill out to receive book
recommendations.
According to The Readers’
Advisory Guide to Genre Fiction (2019), RA is a service used “to help readers
discover titles they are currently in the mood to read” (p. xv). Readers’
advisors should “help…readers find titles they will enjoy,” “listen and respond
to their interests,” and “offer suggestions” (Wyatt & Saricks, 2019, p.
xv). I understand that many librarians aim to teach patrons how to find
information on their own, but, at the same time, services like RA, which is
used more for leisure readers rather than those doing research, often fall through
the cracks. I think this is one reason why RA services are not as popular as
they should be.
RA works two ways and not only benefits patrons, but
also the advisors themselves: “[w]hen readers talk, we learn about their
interests, but we also learn about authors, titles, and genres we’re unfamiliar
with and discover information we can share with other readers” (Saricks, 2015).
What I’ve learned from this assignment is what not to do when a patron asks me for
a book recommendation. I’ve also learned that it’s important to know at least
one title that is similar to what the patron is looking for and maybe even
something that they enjoyed. If the patron does not name a title on their own, the
librarian should ask for one, or perform a Google search to find one that
matches the reader’s preferences. Trying to perform RA without at last one
title as a starting point will likely lead nowhere. The value of RA services is
priceless, and with a little patience and understanding, all parties involved
with learn something new in the process.
References
Saricks, J. (2015). At leisure with Joyce Saricks.
Booklist, 112(7), 25.
Wyatt, N. & Saricks, J. (2019). The readers’ advisory guide to genre fiction (3rd ed.). ALA Editions.
Hi Juliana,
ReplyDeleteI think its good for a librarian to inform a reader about Goodreads or how to use the catalog for read-alikes, etc. but that is not the same as reader's advisory service in the library. It's too bad that she pushed you toward an online form when you were already conversing in real time. Why not just ask you the form questions in the moment to find out more about what you might like? Seems like the librarian really missed an opportunity to match a patron to a book.
Hi Abigail,
DeleteI completely agree! I was pretty disappointed with how this librarian did not take the time to perform a readers' advisory interview with me. I think with virtual reference services, some people may think it's okay to be impersonal. But to me, there is no time constraint when performing virtual reference, so why not take the time to actually suggest titles to a patron? I guess we can all learn a little from my experience.
Hi Juliana and Abigail,
ReplyDeleteIt was really a missed opportunity that the librarian didn’t ask you about books you have read. I chatted with a librarian and she did point out that the library had a readers’ advisory resource form service called Your Next 5 and also booklists made by librarians to assist in readers’ advisory that I could use in the future, but that wasn’t until the end of the transaction. She also encouraged me to use the chat again. She spent over 30 minutes with me in real time suggesting books and talking about books.
Kim,
DeleteYour experience sounds great! I can see the value of a librarian recommending readers' advisory resources, forms, and even NoveList to patrons, but I think trying to help the patron first is more important. Perhaps, I'll try reaching out to another library sometime.
I have noted the above responses as part of everyone's participation.
ReplyDelete