Week Thirteen Prompt: LGBTQ+ and Urban Fiction

As some of today’s libraries abandon the alphabetically-organized fiction section, the separation of particular genres such as LGBTQ+ and Urban Fiction becomes a controversial issue. These genres of fiction belong on library shelves among all of the other genres including science fiction, fantasy, literary fiction, historical fiction, and mysteries, to name a few. Perhaps creating separate sections might make things easier for patrons looking specifically for LGBTQ+ and Urban Fiction titles, but it would eliminate the possibility of other patrons coming across these genres by chance. The separation of these particular genres, which represent individuals from marginalized groups and not just patron interests, is problematic and reflective of segregation.

In her article, “Separate but still not equal,” Jessica Garner points out a very good reason why separating LGBTQ+ fiction is not a good idea: “…it would take enormous courage for a patron to be seen approaching such a collection if that person were just beginning an exploration of their sexuality or gender identity” (Garner, 2018). Libraries are meant to be safe spaces which welcome “[a]ll people, regardless of origin, age, background, or views” and which “protect people’s privacy, safeguarding all library use data” (ALA, 2019). Shelving LGBTQ+ books separately does not align with the intellectual freedoms promised by the American Library Association [ALA] and “removes the ability for a patron to browse comfortably” (Garner, 2018).

In response to a petition to separate LGBTQ+ books in Iowa public libraries, author David Levithan writes, “LGBTQ+ literature can save lives and encourage equality” and that he is “grateful to anyone who defends LGBTQ+ books and, by extension, LGBTQ+ youth from any person who attacks them as needing ‘special treatment’ or being anything less than equal” (Colyard, 2018). The decision to shelve LGBTQ+ books separately would essentially be an attack on the LGBTQ+ community.

Similarly, shelving Urban Fiction or African American Fiction [AAF] books separately in the library is reminiscent of the era of segregation. Urban Fiction is a term used to describe “works set in urban America dealing with drugs, violence, and sex, involving African American or Latino characters” (WorldCat, 2017). While Urban Fiction is not necessarily synonymous with AAF, many bookstores and libraries tend to lump these two genres together.

In a personal blog post, science fiction and fantasy writer N.K. Jemisin writes, “…the AAF section of today is mostly just a constricted, homogenizing ghetto”—a result of “old and new racism” (Jemisin, 2010). The author writes that libraries which shelve her books in AAF sections as opposed to science fiction or fantasy sections “[assume] that [her] work is automatically of interest to black readers—and only black readers—because [she’s] black” (Jemisin, 2010). Conversely, she recognizes that “there are a few white people who might enjoy reading about ‘urban’ topics, if you gave them half a chance, instead of labeling everything like separate water fountains and thereby -creating- a sense of alienation” (Jemisin, 2010). She calls the separation of books by African American writers “an insult to…the abilities of writers of color in general, and an insult to readers of every race” (Jemisin, 2010).

If libraries make changes to shelve LGBTQ+ and/or Urban Fiction collections separately, they are doing a great disservice to all of their patrons and potentially offending and alienating a great deal of them. Petitions like the one in Orange City, Iowa are harmful and aim to bring unnecessary politics into the library. Community groups who sign petitions to create these separate sections are being prejudiced against LGBTQ+ individuals, people of color, and all patrons who are interested in exploring these genres of fiction which may introduce them to diverse characters and settings.

 

References

American Library Association. (2019, January 29). Library bill of rights. http://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/librarybill

Colyard, K.W. (2018, February 23). Here’s what to know about a petition to essentially ban LGBTQ+ books at an Iowa library. Bustle. https://www.bustle.com/p/theres-a-petition-to-separate-lgbtq-books-in-public-libraries-in-iowa-heres-what-you-need-to-know-8308568

Garner, J.  (2018, April 18). Separate but still not equal. The Office for Intellectual Freedom of the American Library Association. https://www.oif.ala.org/oif/?p=13704

Jemisin, N.K. (2010, May 26). Don’t put my book in the African American section. N.K. Jemisin. https://nkjemisin.com/2010/05/dont-put-my-book-in-the-african-american-section/

WorldCat Genres. (2017). Urban fiction. OCLC. https://www.worldcat.org/genres/urban-fiction.html

Comments

  1. Hi Juliana,

    Forcing patrons to go to a separate section for LGBTQ books would absolutely make some people uncomfortable and deter them from looking at those books. I think you hit the nail on the head as to why this is different than putting westerns or mysteries in different sections when you said Urban Fiction and LGBTQ books represent "marginalized groups and not just patron interests."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Christina! I do think that these "genres" (if we even want to call them that) or types of literature serve to represent marginalized groups, and though Urban Fiction is not necessarily African American Fiction, the majority of it is written about Black or Latino characters. Placing these types of literature in "other" sections serves to essentially "other" these groups of people in the library. While some may argue that a separate section would make it easier for patrons to find the LGBTQ+ and/or Urban Fiction books they want, it may also single these patrons out and make them feel uncomfortable. Also, it could cause patrons to completely avoid these sections altogether, and that's not what we want. If any patrons are looking for LGBTQ+ or Urban Fiction books and are having trouble finding them, they should know that librarians are there, without judgement and with respect for patron privacy, to help them find the titles they want.

      Delete
  2. Hello, Juliana.

    I don't necessarily know that separating would be a form of segregation; I think it's rather subjective, personally. If certain genres are prominent or big enough in a collection, I don't see why they couldn't have their own sections. Of course, it could also be seen as segregation, but I suppose it all depends on the community involved.

    Keep up the good work.
    James

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, James! I suppose it could have to do with the community involved, and perhaps I am speaking from my experience of working and living in suburban communities in which the LGBTQ+ and African American populations seem smaller. However, I still think it would be fundamentally wrong to place these types of literature in separate sections as they essentially represent marginalized groups and not just patron interests like mysteries or westerns.

      Delete
  3. Hi Juliana,

    I thought this was a really good, thoughtful response to this. I agree that separating out these books is problematic, and I enjoyed reading your perspective and some of the quotes from the articles you found.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I suppose the feedback of doing such special categorizations would depend much on the community that uses the library. There is a big difference between picking out a library and its system of cataloging books from a random spot in the US and judging those policies on your own ideals, and hearing what a local that uses that particular library thinks of this. At my library, we have an Urban Fiction section and this was mainly due to the African American patron's demand of being able to find such books quicker than having them spread throughout the general fiction section. Ultimately, we have to ask ourselves if we are serving the community around us in the best way and giving them what they want, instead of getting offended on their behalf by rolling around hypotheticals in our heads. Throw the ideas out there, listed to feedback and act accordingly is the best a library organization can do. Similarly, with my library and the patrons that use it, it is difficult to see any LGBTQ patron having issues browsing a specialized section that caters to their sexuality. Many of the staff at my location are in this category and are openly proud of it, as are the patrons. We have yet to install such a section but it is being talked about, as is a Drag Queen Story Hour. Ultimately, the library functions best when it reflects the people it serves and is able to shift focus as the community itself shifts.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great response! I too loved your line " Urban Fiction and LGBTQ books represent "marginalized groups and not just patron interests." Full points!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts